Italo Vignoli wrote: > I have seen mentions of these "23 roles" many times, but I have not seen > a list where they are described in detail. It looks like they have been > developed without even asking the SC members - or the group of the > founders - if this was the right approach.
Since nobody provides the link (the one Klaus-Jürgen sent was not working for me... a problem at mail-archive.com, perhaps?), this is the message that started the discussion about the "23 roles": http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01680.html Actually, a deputy SC member commented on that discussion. The discussion might have later moved somewhere else, or to the wiki. > I am very interested in understanding: > 1. Why you decided to create "roles"... > 2. How you decided to define these "roles" > 3. How you got to the number of "23 roles"... > 4. Which benefits bring these 23 roles to the web site... > I think that once these five questions (maybe silly ones, as I said) get > an answer and are fully understood by the community ... then > we might have a better understanding of the beauties and the advantages > of a different (and improved) web site). Maybe the five (four?) questions are generated by a misunderstanding. You'll see that "Roles" in that context referred to the meaning it has in Drupal, i.e., just "Categories of website users", where a user can belong to more than one category. Regards, Andrea. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
