Chris Zhu wrote:
> Do you mean when we add comment to each file by "wx ea", we just add
> the related CR(s) to files. For example:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> usr/src/Targetdirs
>
> 6764580 RubyGems needs updating to work with the latest versions of
> Ruby on Rails
>
> usr/src/cmd/ruby18/METADATA
>
> 6764580 RubyGems needs updating to work with the latest versions of
> Ruby on Rails
> 6788394 Upgrade Ruby to 1.8.7
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>> One example, usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWruby18r/prototype_i386
>> seems to only clean up the ident line, so that change isn't related to
>> either of the two CRs listed. There's a handful other cases like this.
>>
> For usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWruby18r/prototype_i386, we want to clean up
> the ident problems in the ruby version update. So how should we
> comment for such files?
Use the RubyGems CR and synopsis, after all I made those changes as part
of that update.
Amanda
>> usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWruby18u/prototype_i386.tmpl (&sparc)
>> What is the functionality impact, if any, of the .so and .h file which
>> are being removed?
>>
>>
>>
> Two files are removed in ruby upgrade:
> usr/ruby/1.8/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-solaris{SOL_REV}/enumerator.so
> usr/ruby/1.8/lib/ruby/1.8/i386-solaris{SOL_REV}/largefile.h
> while a new directory is added:
> usr/ruby/1.8/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/i386-solaris{SOL_REV}
>
> Chris
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>
