OK that was DEFINITELY the wrong choice of words, which is probably the root of the confusion. You don't need a trial to BELIEVE someone is guilty. My fault, sorry.
--- In [email protected], "dvm8375" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In America you do. > > --- In [email protected], "Ellen" > <ellengoodman6@> wrote: > > > > I'm getting the impression that they have good reason to believe > the > > majority of them are guilty. Sorry, I'm convinced. You don't > need a > > trial to prove someone is guilty. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "denisesudell" > > <dsudell7781@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ellen" > <ellengoodman6@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > "Those people they arrested should rot in hell. . . . Yes it's > > > possible they arrested some people that were innocent, but I am > > > certain they aren't all innocent. . . . This is sick and these > people > > > deserve whatever is coming to them." > > > > > > Boy, if I ever get arrested and charged with a crime, I hope you > don't > > > serve on the jury. > > > > > > Ever hear of "innocent until proven guilty"? > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/weingartenchatters/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
