Re: [wc] Re: am I crazy to go to London in October?

Mon, 14 Aug 2006 09:22:43 -0700

WOOOOHOOOO Yes... that is all we wanted. It is the semantics of the argument. It's all about splitting hairs and doing it with great passion. All the while knowing people here will still laugh at your jokes.
Got to love community.
Daria

 
On 8/14/06, Ellen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

OK that was DEFINITELY the wrong choice of words, which is probably
the root of the confusion. You don't need a trial to BELIEVE someone
is guilty. My fault, sorry.

--- In [email protected], "dvm8375"


<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In America you do.
>
> --- In [email protected], "Ellen"
> <ellengoodman6@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm getting the impression that they have good reason to believe
> the
> > majority of them are guilty. Sorry, I'm convinced. You don't
> need a
> > trial to prove someone is guilty.
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "denisesudell"
> > <dsudell7781@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "Ellen"
> <ellengoodman6@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > "Those people they arrested should rot in hell. . . . Yes it's
> > > possible they arrested some people that were innocent, but I am
> > > certain they aren't all innocent. . . . This is sick and these
> people
> > > deserve whatever is coming to them."
> > >
> > > Boy, if I ever get arrested and charged with a crime, I hope
you
> don't
> > > serve on the jury.
> > >
> > > Ever hear of "innocent until proven guilty"?
> > >
> >
>


__._,_.___

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



__,_._,___

Reply via email to