On Monday, 10 October 2005 08:29, ott wrote: > On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 08:17:09PM +0200, Isaac Clerencia wrote: > I think if art is good enough for us to want to ship it with the game, > then it should be available in general, and should not be tagged as > specific to one campaign. The other option is moving all "mainline" > campaigns further out from the core, making them more like user campaigns, > with images for each campaign. Both these approaches seem to make sense. > > However, the in-between approach is the worst of both worlds. On the > one hand, it makes it very difficult to separate the campaigns from the > engine (as has been previously mooted). On the other hand, it creates > a situation where some unit portraits are tagged with a campaign name, > even though they are generally useful.
After talking with Ivanovic yesterday, I think the best approach is to have mainline campaigns as similar as possible to user campaigns. Best regards -- Isaac Clerencia at Warp Networks, http://www.warp.es Work: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpuFCFnqJlyw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
