That's OK, though. Those campaigns would still be able to reference images/Heir_to_the_Throne/portraits/lisar.png when they wanted the Li'sar portrait, or the Li'sar unit graphics. The problem right now is that it is really unclear what portraits/images/units are character specific, and which aren't. This reorganization would make that clearer, but it would not stop any campaign designer who wanted to use the images from using them.
However, since I'm not actually going to do any of the reorganizing, and wouldn't know how if I was going to... I'll just leave the decision making to someone else. ott wrote: >On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:17:30PM -0500, Joseph Simmons wrote: > > >>The point is, though, that although those units may be used in other >>campaigns, they _shouldn't_ be. They are character-specific. It would be >>like using the Li'sar portrait for some other princess. So, this >>reorganizing is a subtle hint for people to stop using units the wrong >>way. ;) >> >> > >Just because a portrait is character specific does not mean it has to be >confined to one campaign. Most of the user campaigns are set in the same >timeline and geography as the mainline campaigns, and some explicitly >reuse characters: Kalenz comes to mind, as does Delfador, and some of >the EI characters are at least mentioned in the two Aelius campaigns. >I would not be surprised if someone did a campaign with Li'sar -- after >all, how did she become such an accomplished commander? > >-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >_______________________________________________ >Wesnoth-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > > > -- Joseph Simmons Túrin Turambar, master of doom, by doom mastered www.wesnoth.org
