On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 00:28:40 +0100, jeremy rosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thx for doing the work on trunk, thix warning thing is going to be a bit > painfull at fist, but big benefits in the long run...
Yeah, I kept waiting for someone to fix it so it would build again here. But probably I am the only one who has update access and is using gcc 4.3 on my main machine (via Fedora Rawhide). So I finally just went through and took a look at each warning. > I am not sure it's worth poirting to 1.4 though > > "if it ain't broken" and all that... That's kind of what I figured. The 1.4 branch doesn't even have the warning to error promotion on by default. However there were 3 (I think) changes that appeared to be actual bugs and one use of an anonymous typedef to define constants which seems to be nonstandard. Assuming they are also in the 1.4 branch, should I backport those changes? (Those would be the ones where I noted a 'semantic change'.) _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
