On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:04:11 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However there were 3 (I think) changes that appeared to be actual bugs > and one use of an anonymous typedef to define constants which seems to > be nonstandard. Assuming they are also in the 1.4 branch, should I > backport those changes? (Those would be the ones where I noted a 'semantic > change'.)
To be more specific I am asking about backporting r24823, r24827, r24855 and r24874. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
