Thats been my feeling. I've been very happy with the program otherwise. I've thought about building an alert system of my own just to avoid doing that. I really don't want the extra network trafic. Has anybody tried doing something like that? If so how? It's more work then putting a duplicate copy of the network in, but it offers more flexibility so . . .
--Jared -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brian W. Spolarich Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Alert notification Lights, Camera, Interaction! - IT wrote: > I'm currently evaluating Whats Up Gold and trying to figure out how > other people have handled alerts. I would like to have the system > setup to send different types of notifications depending on the > circumstances of the alert. For instance, I want to receive a page if > a system is down, but I only want a screen pop if the processor is > pegged. Same server but different situations which warrent different > respones. How does everyone else handle this? Any help would be > greatly appreciated as this is one of the deciding factors in my > decision. Thanks. At the moment you'll have to place the device multiple times on the map and associate the monitor and alert with each different instance. This is quite cumbersome, and is I think a defect in the data/object model underlying WUG. Alert should be a property of the monitored service, not the host. -bws Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
