Yes! I often use such constructs and I would really like to have a valid template. So, if it's easy to implement, as you wrote, It would be a very usefull thing. Stefan
________________________________ Von: Juergen Donnerstag [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Di 26.12.2006 12:07 An: [email protected] Betreff: <wicket:pseudo> Ingram created the following RFE: ======================== I occasionally encounter a problem, for example, a template like: <tr> <span wicket:id="groupAB"> <td>field A</td> <td>field B</td> </span> <td>field C</td> </tr> groupAB is just functional group and will always setRenderBodyOnly(true), so rendered page will be validated. But the problem is the template is not validated... Is it possible to create a psuedo tag like: <tr> <wicket:pseudo wicket:id="groupAB"> <td>field A</td> <td>field B</td> </wicket:pseudo> <td>field C</td> </tr> or something like <wicket:tagholder>. Such tag does nothing and always render body only. By separating namespace, it makes template clean and validated. ======================== It is easy to implement. Shall we add it or not? WDYT? Juergen
