what do you prefer? wicket:div? wicket:span? wicket:tag? anything else?
Juergen On 12/27/06, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
good idea. but pseudo is awfully cryptic. Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > Ingram created the following RFE: > > ======================== > I occasionally encounter a problem, for example, a template like: > > <tr> > <span wicket:id="groupAB"> > <td>field A</td> > <td>field B</td> > </span> > <td>field C</td> > </tr> > > groupAB is just functional group and will always > setRenderBodyOnly(true), so rendered page will be validated. > But the problem is the template is not validated... Is it possible to > create a psuedo tag like: > > <tr> > <wicket:pseudo wicket:id="groupAB"> > <td>field A</td> > <td>field B</td> > </wicket:pseudo> > <td>field C</td> > </tr> > > or something like <wicket:tagholder>. Such tag does nothing and always > render body only. > By separating namespace, it makes template clean and validated. > ======================== > > It is easy to implement. Shall we add it or not? WDYT? > > Juergen > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%3Cwicket%3Apseudo%3E-tf2881952.html#a8059782 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
