<wicket:component> ?
I am serious. I am using <wicket:component> for this all the time.
Regards,
Erik.
Igor Vaynberg wroet:
<wicket:tag> ?
-igor
On 12/26/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<wicket:div> ?
johan
On 12/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ingram created the following RFE:
>
> ========================
> I occasionally encounter a problem, for example, a template like:
>
> <tr>
> <span wicket:id="groupAB">
> <td>field A</td>
> <td>field B</td>
> </span>
> <td>field C</td>
> </tr>
>
> groupAB is just functional group and will always
> setRenderBodyOnly(true), so rendered page will be validated.
> But the problem is the template is not validated... Is it possible to
> create a psuedo tag like:
>
> <tr>
> <wicket:pseudo wicket:id="groupAB">
> <td>field A</td>
> <td>field B</td>
> </wicket:pseudo>
> <td>field C</td>
> </tr>
>
> or something like <wicket:tagholder>. Such tag does nothing and always
> render body only.
> By separating namespace, it makes template clean and validated.
> ========================
>
> It is easy to implement. Shall we add it or not? WDYT?
>
> Juergen
>
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
