<wicket:container> !
On 12/27/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what do you prefer? wicket:div? wicket:span? wicket:tag? anything else? Juergen On 12/27/06, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > good idea. but pseudo is awfully cryptic. > > > Juergen Donnerstag wrote: > > > > Ingram created the following RFE: > > > > ======================== > > I occasionally encounter a problem, for example, a template like: > > > > <tr> > > <span wicket:id="groupAB"> > > <td>field A</td> > > <td>field B</td> > > </span> > > <td>field C</td> > > </tr> > > > > groupAB is just functional group and will always > > setRenderBodyOnly(true), so rendered page will be validated. > > But the problem is the template is not validated... Is it possible to > > create a psuedo tag like: > > > > <tr> > > <wicket:pseudo wicket:id="groupAB"> > > <td>field A</td> > > <td>field B</td> > > </wicket:pseudo> > > <td>field C</td> > > </tr> > > > > or something like <wicket:tagholder>. Such tag does nothing and always > > render body only. > > By separating namespace, it makes template clean and validated. > > ======================== > > > > It is easy to implement. Shall we add it or not? WDYT? > > > > Juergen > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%3Cwicket%3Apseudo%3E-tf2881952.html#a8059782 > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
