You can use whatever you like. Take a look at SimplePageTest_14
Juergen
On 12/26/06, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<wicket:component> ?
I am serious. I am using <wicket:component> for this all the time.
Regards,
Erik.
Igor Vaynberg wroet:
> <wicket:tag> ?
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 12/26/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> <wicket:div> ?
>>
>> johan
>>
>>
>> On 12/26/06, Juergen Donnerstag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ingram created the following RFE:
>> >
>> > ========================
>> > I occasionally encounter a problem, for example, a template like:
>> >
>> > <tr>
>> > <span wicket:id="groupAB">
>> > <td>field A</td>
>> > <td>field B</td>
>> > </span>
>> > <td>field C</td>
>> > </tr>
>> >
>> > groupAB is just functional group and will always
>> > setRenderBodyOnly(true), so rendered page will be validated.
>> > But the problem is the template is not validated... Is it possible to
>> > create a psuedo tag like:
>> >
>> > <tr>
>> > <wicket:pseudo wicket:id="groupAB">
>> > <td>field A</td>
>> > <td>field B</td>
>> > </wicket:pseudo>
>> > <td>field C</td>
>> > </tr>
>> >
>> > or something like <wicket:tagholder>. Such tag does nothing and always
>> > render body only.
>> > By separating namespace, it makes template clean and validated.
>> > ========================
>> >
>> > It is easy to implement. Shall we add it or not? WDYT?
>> >
>> > Juergen
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
Erik van Oosten
http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
