hmm that would solve so many problems we have...
So you let IE stay in quircks mode and have for firefox that -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
and for other browsers (maybe IE7) the CSS3? standard: box-sizing: border-box;
What is your doctype?
johan
On 5/18/06, Matej Knopp
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> allow myself to quote...myself
>
> || imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser apps. add
> css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.
>
> i never said css was great for layout manager :) and yes the box model
> is broken.
The box model really is broken. Therefore I always stick with IE box model
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
}
The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in
standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this setup. I'm
doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and
everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw everything up.
-Matej
>
> -Igor
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Johan Compagner* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> ha! and css is easier then layout manager in java...
> hmm that is not how i see it.
> CSS is just plain horrible stupid box thing..
>
> And what is a layout manager in css? There isn't one everything is
> sort of absoluut positioned and then you can do in swing also
> (not recommended ofcourse)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Igor Vaynberg* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote:
>
> imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser
> apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.
>
> the one thing you always hear swing developers bitching about is
> how they have to fight the layout managers to get the results
> they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge pain to work
> with.
>
> matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing devels, its
> nice and easy to create layouts. but it still requires a gui to
> do this, while i can do html easily by hand. also browser screen
> space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space. in desktop
> space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware of your
> fonts and the south east corner of the window. in html you have
> none of these things.
>
> look at wingS framework examples, they use layout managers. look
> how rectangular their examples look.
>
> -Igor
>
>
>
>
> On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps I might enjoy
> programming in Echo2 better.
>
> But suppose an employer maintained an HTML fragment with
> links to their
> entire portfolio of web applications, and wanted this
> fragment to appear
> on every page of each web application. Since someone else is
> maintaining that scrap and keeping it up-to-date, I would
> not want to
> translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own copy.
>
> Would it not likely be easier to incorporate such an HTML
> scrap into a
> Wicket application, versus one written in a framework such
> as Echo 2
> that abstracted away the HTML completely?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] On Behalf
> Of Eelco
> Hillenius
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
> To: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit integration ?
>
> > It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at haxe.org
> <http://haxe.org> if you find
> > it interesting), ...
> ...
> Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout managers -
> basically the
> same promise as Swing has - but currently I would still
> prefer using
> HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of developing
> applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a long time ago.
> GWT looks
> like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very big name
> behind it, and
> some cool innovations. ... Eelco
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
> services, security?
> Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to
> make your job easier
> Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on
> Apache Geronimo
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642
> <http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642>
> _______________________________________________
> Wicket-user mailing list
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> <mailto:Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
