Sure, if it has to be just like Wicket to compete; you win. ;-)

/Anders

Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> I looked into some demos briefly yesterday, but it looks to me that
> it's quite different from Wicket. It looks nice when it comes to tool
> integration etc, but I immediately missed the 'just Java programming'/
> OO part of Wicket.
> 
> Eelco
> 
> 
> On 8/29/06, Anders Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Korbinian Bachl wrote:
>>> Hi Anders,
>>>
>>> i heard much about WebObjects, and have a qustion: is it true, that you need
>>> apple (OS) in order to run it ? - where here with Windows/ Linux
>>> environments....
>> Not at all. I use version 5.2.4. It has official support for development
>> tools on Mac and Windows and deployment on Mac, Windows and Solaris. You
>> can run it on any j2se (1.4) platform. Many use Linux.
>>
>> About a year ago Apple released 5.3:
>> 1) Development environment mas made part of Apple's Xcode, and
>> distributed for free.
>> 2) Deployment license is bundled with Mac OS X Server.
>> 3) Officially Apple only supports their own hardware and OS. There are
>> very good open source tools (better than Apple's) that support
>> development on any platform, and you can deploy on any platform, but you
>> have to buy Mac OS X Server to get a deployment license.
>>
>>
>> Recently at WWDC Apple made some new announcement. I don't know exactly
>> what it was. All I know is this:
>>
>> http://lists.apple.com/archives/webobjects-dev/2006/Aug/msg01144.html
>>
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Korbinian
>>>
>>> PS: can you point out what in your opinion is superior to Wicket from
>>> WebObjects ? e.g. a small comparision?
>>>
>>>> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag
>>>> von Anders Peterson
>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. August 2006 10:41
>>>> An: wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> Betreff: Re: [Wicket-user] WebObjects open source?
>>>>
>>>> I know WebObjects much better than I know Wicket...
>>>>
>>>> The only reason I looked at Wicket is because Apple made some
>>>> very strange decisions regarding licensing and support for
>>>> other platforms about a year ago. Should the open source
>>>> rumors be true (I'm not sure they are) I'll most likely go
>>>> back to (stay with) WebObjects.
>>>>
>>>> This is a good place to start:
>>>>
>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebObjects
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WebObjects has a very good on-line community, and there is a
>>>> collection of open source frameworks and development tools
>>>> that support/extend it.
>>>> One you should definitely know about is WOLips:
>>>>
>>>> http://objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WOL/Home
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>> Apple will make (most of) WebObjects open source with the
>>>> new release
>>>>> (http://www.thinksecret.com/news/0608webobjects.html).
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone worked with WebObjects and wishes to comment on
>>>> it compared
>>>>> to Wicket?
>>>>>
>>>>> Martijn


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to