chasemp added a comment. I think in theory we could (maybe during normal user update I guess) take a historical issue, find it's new counterpart, track down transactions (phabricator ones), parse out comment transactions, match them up by order or creation date, and assign the comment to the appropriate user's new identity in the new system. But that still leave's behind artifacts such as "foo commented on xx:xx:xx" since all comments need context in case the user never registers, and in general from my perspective it doesn't seem worth it.
All ticket and issue sorting is done by the issue metadata, so we aren't losing really search / sort features per say. Is the primarily formatting or consistency or sanity? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T572 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: chasemp Cc: wikibugs-l, chasemp, Aklapper, Qgil, mmodell, Eloquence, faidon, jeremyb _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
