https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26122
--- Comment #20 from superyet...@yahoo.com 2010-12-01 20:43:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > The topic is related to an API request, so there is no need to say > > ar_page_id > > stores it since it is unreachable. > > It's actually a very useful thing to say -- it indicates to the other > developers that yes, there is a way internally to get that information, and > therefore that's how an implementation would be built to expose the > information. What is the use for saying it if that piece of information is not accessible? This is a bug report about the API, so we do not need to know it is stored in the database, right? I do not think there is a single "developer" who think it is not stored in the database! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
