Tarrow added a comment.
I think that would probably not work that well. We don't really want to provide editors with a mixed old/new experience where they can edit some items but not others. I think we aren't too worried about the load from mobile pageviews so the fact that after deployment we'd have just cache misses is probably fine. I think we're settled that we want to split the cache by new / old termbox. This means we'll avoid the above error; we'll also avoid the inverse error if we have to revert the deployment and there are now some.new termboxes in the cache. I think the question now is simply where is it best to do the splitting the cache? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T228978 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Tarrow Cc: WMDE-leszek, Addshore, Tarrow, Jakob_WMDE, Aklapper, Michael, Hook696, Daryl-TTMG, RomaAmorRoma, 0010318400, E.S.A-Sheild, darthmon_wmde, joker88john, DannyS712, CucyNoiD, Nandana, NebulousIris, Gaboe420, Versusxo, Majesticalreaper22, Giuliamocci, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Af420, Darkminds3113, Bsandipan, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, WSH1906, Lewizho99, Maathavan, _jensen, rosalieper, Jonas, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Jdforrester-WMF, Mbch331, Jay8g, Krenair
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
