Replying only to say: this is an amazing thread; thank you for compiling
the research (deserves its own overview page on Wikidata...), and wow, yes,
*wiki.js* is looking good these days.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:55 AM Brian M. Watson <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys Lemus-Rojas after I
> approached her with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it.
>
> I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a semantic/linked data capable
> content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation
> capabilities. What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about
> Paris, I'm looking for something that would autofill linked data 'under the
> hood' by either a dropdown (a la Omeka's Value Suggest
> <https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/>), a autofill (a la
> wikidata/pedia) or something that creates semantic blog tags.
>
> I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof of concept called
> nanotation <http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html> that
> looks about right, but might be completely different then what I actually
> want, which is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills
> URIs, and works like a blog/content management system.
>
> So far I've explored
>
>    -
>
>    *Recogito* (https://recogito.pelagios.org/) is lovely but focused on
>    annotating images/maps/preexisting items.
>    -
>
>    *Catma* (https://catma.de/) is lovely looking but builds off
>    preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the
>    text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids.
>    Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The same
>    program (? project?) also puts out forText (https://fortext.net/),
>    which i just include here as it's also nice.
>    -
>
>    *dokie.li <http://dokie.li>* (https://dokie.li/) This seems the
>    closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and social
>    interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains quite
>    the technical hurdle for me
>    -
>
>    *Atomgraph* (https://atomgraph.com/) is knowledge graph oriented and
>    installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on content management.
>    Gephi on steroids.
>    -
>
>    *Webanno* (https://webanno.github.io/webanno/) which is specifically
>    targeted at linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating
>    content.
>    -
>
>    *Wikibase*: A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with.
>    In this scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda
>    hack a blog out of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed.
>    -
>
>    I also tried *wiki.js* (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't support
>    linked data yet) and *OntoWiki* (which looks like it also builds off a
>    preexisting knowledge graph)
>    -
>
>    *Anthologize*: (https://anthologize.org/) also looks very close as a
>    wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I didn't explore
>    ways to make it so.
>    -
>
>    I've also explored *wordpress*
>    <https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-linked-data/> and Drupal plugins (one
>    <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldp>, two
>    <https://www.drupal.org/project/linked_data>, three
>    <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldt>) that are all obsolete or not
>    maintained anymore
>
> My longterm goal with this is to create semantic libguides and blogs. I
> really do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that
> pulls knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some
> blog-type software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and
> pieces of it, but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak).
>
> I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got for www.histsex.com (soon
> to be www.histsex.org just in case you're clicking that in a week or
> so!). This "bibliography" is all in omeka and it works effectively *like*
> a libguide, but will need further plugins to make it all work as desired,
> so I continue to investigate alternatives.
>
> Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed to do in a broader
> way? Or is there something obvious I've missed here?
>
> Thank you all for your time!
>
> --
>
>
> *BRIAN M. WATSON *they/them
> twitter <https://twitter.com/brimwats> - website <https://brimwats.com/>
> PhD: UBC SLAIS <https://slais.ubc.ca/>
> Director: HistSex.org <https://histsex.com/>
> Editorial Board: Homosaurus <http://homosaurus.org/about>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>


-- 
Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to