Started here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sj/LDCM Feel free to move to an appropriate namespace, I wasn't sure where it should end up.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:39 PM Goran Milovanovic < [email protected]> wrote: > Someone should definitely take some time to compile this thread into a > page. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 19:00 Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Replying only to say: this is an amazing thread; thank you for compiling >> the research (deserves its own overview page on Wikidata...), and wow, yes, >> *wiki.js* is looking good these days. >> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:55 AM Brian M. Watson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys Lemus-Rojas after I >>> approached her with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it. >>> >>> I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a semantic/linked data >>> capable content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation >>> capabilities. What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about >>> Paris, I'm looking for something that would autofill linked data 'under the >>> hood' by either a dropdown (a la Omeka's Value Suggest >>> <https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/>), a autofill (a la >>> wikidata/pedia) or something that creates semantic blog tags. >>> >>> I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof of concept called >>> nanotation <http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html> that >>> looks about right, but might be completely different then what I actually >>> want, which is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills >>> URIs, and works like a blog/content management system. >>> >>> So far I've explored >>> >>> - >>> >>> *Recogito* (https://recogito.pelagios.org/) is lovely but focused on >>> annotating images/maps/preexisting items. >>> - >>> >>> *Catma* (https://catma.de/) is lovely looking but builds off >>> preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the >>> text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids. >>> Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The >>> same >>> program (? project?) also puts out forText (https://fortext.net/), >>> which i just include here as it's also nice. >>> - >>> >>> *dokie.li <http://dokie.li>* (https://dokie.li/) This seems the >>> closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and social >>> interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains quite >>> the technical hurdle for me >>> - >>> >>> *Atomgraph* (https://atomgraph.com/) is knowledge graph oriented and >>> installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on content >>> management. >>> Gephi on steroids. >>> - >>> >>> *Webanno* (https://webanno.github.io/webanno/) which is specifically >>> targeted at linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating >>> content. >>> - >>> >>> *Wikibase*: A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with. >>> In this scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda >>> hack a blog out of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed. >>> - >>> >>> I also tried *wiki.js* (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't >>> support linked data yet) and *OntoWiki* (which looks like it also >>> builds off a preexisting knowledge graph) >>> - >>> >>> *Anthologize*: (https://anthologize.org/) also looks very close as a >>> wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I didn't explore >>> ways to make it so. >>> - >>> >>> I've also explored *wordpress* >>> <https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-linked-data/> and Drupal plugins ( >>> one <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldp>, two >>> <https://www.drupal.org/project/linked_data>, three >>> <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldt>) that are all obsolete or not >>> maintained anymore >>> >>> My longterm goal with this is to create semantic libguides and blogs. I >>> really do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that >>> pulls knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some >>> blog-type software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and >>> pieces of it, but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak). >>> >>> I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got for www.histsex.com (soon >>> to be www.histsex.org just in case you're clicking that in a week or >>> so!). This "bibliography" is all in omeka and it works effectively >>> *like* a libguide, but will need further plugins to make it all work as >>> desired, so I continue to investigate alternatives. >>> >>> Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed to do in a broader >>> way? Or is there something obvious I've missed here? >>> >>> Thank you all for your time! >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> *BRIAN M. WATSON *they/them >>> twitter <https://twitter.com/brimwats> - website <https://brimwats.com/> >>> PhD: UBC SLAIS <https://slais.ubc.ca/> >>> Director: HistSex.org <https://histsex.com/> >>> Editorial Board: Homosaurus <http://homosaurus.org/about> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>> >> >> >> -- >> Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266 >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > -- Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
