Someone should definitely take some time to compile this thread into a page.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 19:00 Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > Replying only to say: this is an amazing thread; thank you for compiling > the research (deserves its own overview page on Wikidata...), and wow, yes, > *wiki.js* is looking good these days. > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:55 AM Brian M. Watson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys Lemus-Rojas after I >> approached her with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it. >> >> I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a semantic/linked data >> capable content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation >> capabilities. What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about >> Paris, I'm looking for something that would autofill linked data 'under the >> hood' by either a dropdown (a la Omeka's Value Suggest >> <https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/>), a autofill (a la >> wikidata/pedia) or something that creates semantic blog tags. >> >> I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof of concept called >> nanotation <http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html> that >> looks about right, but might be completely different then what I actually >> want, which is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills >> URIs, and works like a blog/content management system. >> >> So far I've explored >> >> - >> >> *Recogito* (https://recogito.pelagios.org/) is lovely but focused on >> annotating images/maps/preexisting items. >> - >> >> *Catma* (https://catma.de/) is lovely looking but builds off >> preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the >> text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids. >> Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The >> same >> program (? project?) also puts out forText (https://fortext.net/), >> which i just include here as it's also nice. >> - >> >> *dokie.li <http://dokie.li>* (https://dokie.li/) This seems the >> closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and social >> interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains quite >> the technical hurdle for me >> - >> >> *Atomgraph* (https://atomgraph.com/) is knowledge graph oriented and >> installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on content >> management. >> Gephi on steroids. >> - >> >> *Webanno* (https://webanno.github.io/webanno/) which is specifically >> targeted at linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating >> content. >> - >> >> *Wikibase*: A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with. >> In this scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda >> hack a blog out of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed. >> - >> >> I also tried *wiki.js* (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't support >> linked data yet) and *OntoWiki* (which looks like it also builds off >> a preexisting knowledge graph) >> - >> >> *Anthologize*: (https://anthologize.org/) also looks very close as a >> wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I didn't explore >> ways to make it so. >> - >> >> I've also explored *wordpress* >> <https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-linked-data/> and Drupal plugins ( >> one <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldp>, two >> <https://www.drupal.org/project/linked_data>, three >> <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldt>) that are all obsolete or not >> maintained anymore >> >> My longterm goal with this is to create semantic libguides and blogs. I >> really do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that >> pulls knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some >> blog-type software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and >> pieces of it, but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak). >> >> I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got for www.histsex.com (soon >> to be www.histsex.org just in case you're clicking that in a week or >> so!). This "bibliography" is all in omeka and it works effectively *like* >> a libguide, but will need further plugins to make it all work as desired, >> so I continue to investigate alternatives. >> >> Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed to do in a broader >> way? Or is there something obvious I've missed here? >> >> Thank you all for your time! >> >> -- >> >> >> *BRIAN M. WATSON *they/them >> twitter <https://twitter.com/brimwats> - website <https://brimwats.com/> >> PhD: UBC SLAIS <https://slais.ubc.ca/> >> Director: HistSex.org <https://histsex.com/> >> Editorial Board: Homosaurus <http://homosaurus.org/about> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > > -- > Samuel Klein @metasj w:user:sj +1 617 529 4266 > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
