Hello Brian, sorry for replying so late, but you should definitely check out Semantic MediaWiki: [ https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/ | https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org ]
In conjunction with PageForms and External Data extensions, I showed a small demo how to semi-automatically reference to Wikdata IDs. The form is looking up a newly to be created entry and suggests the Wikidata ID in the form field. [ https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/CC0878458455 | https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/CC0878458455 ] regards, Bernhard ----- Am 18. Jun 2020 um 8:26 schrieb Brian M. Watson <[email protected]>: > Hello all, > I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys Lemus-Rojas after I approached > her > with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it. > I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a semantic/linked data capable > content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation > capabilities. > What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about Paris, I'm looking > for something that would autofill linked data 'under the hood' by either a > dropdown (a la Omeka's [ https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/ | Value > Suggest ] ), a autofill (a la wikidata/pedia) or something that creates > semantic blog tags. > I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof of concept called [ > http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html | nanotation ] that looks > about right, but might be completely different then what I actually want, > which > is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills URIs, and works > like a blog/content management system. > So far I've explored > * > Recogito ( [ https://recogito.pelagios.org/ | https://recogito.pelagios.org/ > ] ) > is lovely but focused on annotating images/maps/preexisting items. > * > Catma ( [ https://catma.de/ | https://catma.de/ ] ) is lovely looking but > builds > off preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the > text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids. > Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The same > program (? project?) also puts out forText ( [ https://fortext.net/ | > https://fortext.net/ ] ), which i just include here as it's also nice. > * > [ http://dokie.li/ | dokie.li ] ( [ https://dokie.li/ | https://dokie.li/ ] ) > This seems the closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and > social interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains > quite > the technical hurdle for me > * > Atomgraph ( [ https://atomgraph.com/ | https://atomgraph.com/ ] ) is knowledge > graph oriented and installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on > content management. Gephi on steroids. > * > Webanno ( [ https://webanno.github.io/webanno/ | > https://webanno.github.io/webanno/ ] ) which is specifically targeted at > linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating content. > * > Wikibase : A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with. In this > scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda hack a blog > out > of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed. > * > I also tried wiki.js (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't support linked > data > yet) and OntoWiki (which looks like it also builds off a preexisting knowledge > graph) > * > Anthologize : ( [ https://anthologize.org/ | https://anthologize.org/ ] ) also > looks very close as a wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I > didn't explore ways to make it so. > * > I've also explored [ https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-linked-data/ | > wordpress ] > and Drupal plugins ( [ https://www.drupal.org/project/ldp | one ] , [ > https://www.drupal.org/project/linked_data | two ] , [ > https://www.drupal.org/project/ldt | three ] ) that are all obsolete or not > maintained anymore > My longterm goal with this is to create semantic libguides and blogs. I really > do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that pulls > knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some blog-type > software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and pieces of it, > but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak). > I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got for [ > http://www.histsex.com/ | > www.histsex.com ] (soon to be [ http://www.histsex.org/ | www.histsex.org ] > just in case you're clicking that in a week or so!). This "bibliography" is > all > in omeka and it works effectively like a libguide, but will need further > plugins to make it all work as desired, so I continue to investigate > alternatives. > Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed to do in a broader way? > Or > is there something obvious I've missed here? > Thank you all for your time! > -- > BRIAN M. WATSON > they/them > [ https://twitter.com/brimwats | twitter ] - [ https://brimwats.com/ | > website ] > PhD: [ https://slais.ubc.ca/ | UBC SLAIS ] > Director: [ https://histsex.com/ | HistSex.org ] > Editorial Board: [ http://homosaurus.org/about | Homosaurus ] > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
