Thank you to everyone who replied to my recent query! To answer some
questions:

Thomas Francart — Thank you for sharing the Semantic Markdown draft. I love
this a lot. I hope it matures! I think that's possible, yes, but the goal
here was to set up something that could be run off a server like a website,
and securely hosted. Admittedly, much of this might be beyond my own
expertise—I am hugely self-taughr in this area.

Thad Guidry — A ghost plugin would be welcome! I should also note that I
tried the following 'standard' content managers and tried to find
appropiate plugins but they simply did not work or I could not find what I
needed:

   - BlogoText
   - Concrete5
   - Cowyo
   - Dokuwiki
   - DotClear 2
   - Grav
   - Libreto
   - Lionwiki
   - PluXml
   - PrettyNoemie CMS

 It is worth noting that Scalar (https://scalar.me/anvc/) *does *support
linked data, but when i tried it it seemed to have limited number of
ontologies available/isn't the right format for a blog.

Thanks to Samuel Klein for compiling these threads here:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Sj/LDCM

  David Mason: Yes, wiki.js is very nice looking. I would also be happy to
support a plugin financially (though unfortunately PhD students don't
aren't paid *super *well and I don't have too many funds to play around
with :) ). However wiki.js is so smooth and nice to play around in that it
would be worth it — ghost would be great as well.

Right now I might be stuck with hacking together a mediawiki blog!

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 3:24 PM David H. Mason <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> wiki.js is an eye opener, and it's donor driven. Depending what this
> extension does, I could provide some funding (I'm also a javascript
> developer, though a bit overstretched). I have been experimenting with
> embedding rdflib in markup based annotations (based on Semantic Mediawiki's
> in-text annotation style), for a kind of "semantic tiddlywiki," while
> already useful it has a long way to go to be pleasant. Would be very happy
> to support a larger project along these lines.
>
> David
>
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 10:55, Brian M. Watson <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys Lemus-Rojas after I
>> approached her with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it.
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a semantic/linked data
>> capable content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation
>> capabilities. What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about
>> Paris, I'm looking for something that would autofill linked data 'under the
>> hood' by either a dropdown (a la Omeka's Value Suggest
>> <https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/>), a autofill (a la
>> wikidata/pedia) or something that creates semantic blog tags.
>>
>> I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof of concept called
>> nanotation <http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html> that
>> looks about right, but might be completely different then what I actually
>> want, which is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills
>> URIs, and works like a blog/content management system.
>>
>> So far I've explored
>>
>>    -
>>
>>    *Recogito* (https://recogito.pelagios.org/) is lovely but focused on
>>    annotating images/maps/preexisting items.
>>    -
>>
>>    *Catma* (https://catma.de/) is lovely looking but builds off
>>    preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the
>>    text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids.
>>    Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The 
>> same
>>    program (? project?) also puts out forText (https://fortext.net/),
>>    which i just include here as it's also nice.
>>    -
>>
>>    *dokie.li <http://dokie.li>* (https://dokie.li/) This seems the
>>    closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and social
>>    interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains quite
>>    the technical hurdle for me
>>    -
>>
>>    *Atomgraph* (https://atomgraph.com/) is knowledge graph oriented and
>>    installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on content 
>> management.
>>    Gephi on steroids.
>>    -
>>
>>    *Webanno* (https://webanno.github.io/webanno/) which is specifically
>>    targeted at linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating
>>    content.
>>    -
>>
>>    *Wikibase*: A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with.
>>    In this scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda
>>    hack a blog out of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed.
>>    -
>>
>>    I also tried *wiki.js* (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't support
>>    linked data yet) and *OntoWiki* (which looks like it also builds off
>>    a preexisting knowledge graph)
>>    -
>>
>>    *Anthologize*: (https://anthologize.org/) also looks very close as a
>>    wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I didn't explore
>>    ways to make it so.
>>    -
>>
>>    I've also explored *wordpress*
>>    <https://wordpress.org/plugins/wp-linked-data/> and Drupal plugins (
>>    one <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldp>, two
>>    <https://www.drupal.org/project/linked_data>, three
>>    <https://www.drupal.org/project/ldt>) that are all obsolete or not
>>    maintained anymore
>>
>> My longterm goal with this is to create semantic libguides and blogs. I
>> really do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that
>> pulls knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some
>> blog-type software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and
>> pieces of it, but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak).
>>
>> I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got for www.histsex.com (soon
>> to be www.histsex.org just in case you're clicking that in a week or
>> so!). This "bibliography" is all in omeka and it works effectively *like*
>> a libguide, but will need further plugins to make it all work as desired,
>> so I continue to investigate alternatives.
>>
>> Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed to do in a broader
>> way? Or is there something obvious I've missed here?
>>
>> Thank you all for your time!
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> *BRIAN M. WATSON *they/them
>> twitter <https://twitter.com/brimwats> - website <https://brimwats.com/>
>> PhD: UBC SLAIS <https://slais.ubc.ca/>
>> Director: HistSex.org <https://histsex.com/>
>> Editorial Board: Homosaurus <http://homosaurus.org/about>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>
>
> --
> http://zooid.org/vid
>


-- 


*BRIAN M. WATSON *they/them
twitter <https://twitter.com/brimwats> - website <https://brimwats.com/>
PhD: UBC SLAIS <https://slais.ubc.ca/>
Director: HistSex.org <https://histsex.com/>
Editorial Board: Homosaurus <http://homosaurus.org/about>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to