> we don't talk about "ppLearning" (pencil & paper learning) or "cbLearning" (chalk board learning)
No - but we do talk about 'group learning' and 'rote learning' and 'programmed learning' (among others). So maybe we should regard it as a historical quirk that the chalkboard and the pen and paper don't get a mention when we talk about types of learning. The question is whether the internet (or other variants of e-) constitute a form of learning that is distinct. And - with things like Web 2.0 and blogs and wikis and all that - I think that the e- *does* constitute a type of learning fundamentally different from the pen and paper, both in terms of methodology, and in terms of result. -- Stephen valerie wrote: > It's all about Learning. > > As someone observed, we don't talk about "ppLearning" (pencil & paper > learning) or "cbLearning" (chalk board learning) - the "e" is just a > tool and part of the process. However, it does provide many new > possibilities to support a much larger and more diverse population of > learners. > > > > On Jul 13, 5:45 am, "Wong Leo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This is the question I have been thinking , >> what do you think ? >> >> Leo >> >> -- >> HELP 项目论坛https://groups.google.com/group/helpelephantsliveproject >> > > > > -- --- Stephen Downes ~ Researcher ~ National Research Council Canada http://www.downes.ca ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Free Learning --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
