Wow!!!!
Truely enlightened words Leigh. All that stone throwing really paid
off, eh.
Seriously. This is an amazing list, I am in full support of every
point.
And in regards to point 9. I vote for differentiating ourselves
radically from a MediaWiki Foundation model.
We do need to become very Web2.0. Being very loosely coupled so to
encourage the addition of good extensions while providing preference
to no partner.
I sometimes think we should branch from MediaWiki... that's a
different discussion...

Go, Leigh, Go...

I really liked the ski boot dance...

Be Well!

Peter



On Nov 5, 12:26 am, "Leigh Blackall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leo, thanks for joining in, it is very nice to hear from you! Its been quite
> a while.
> Peter, you can see my wife and I dance the wiki
> jig<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AArrfX9jrlw>that Randy started, and
> most recently, here
> I go <http://flickr.com/photos/leighblackall/3004204811/> over the weekend
> in the mountains. Embarrassing!
>
> How would we develop a more networked approach? Here's a big hot air balloon
> to spit ball...
>
>    1. We would tone down (turn off) the Wikieducator talk, and talk up the
>    projects on Wikieducator.
>    2. Make more of Steve and Miinhaaj's monthly User award. Do Randy's
>    suggestion of "Project of the Month". Set up a Wikieducator blog and assign
>    guest writers. Hold monthly webconferences to hear from the people behind
>    the Project of the Month.
>    3. Stop using rhetoric and competitive data about building a Wikieducator
>    community or family and spend energy promoting and celebrating the projects
>    and the individuals behind them.
>    4. Discourage celebrity and singular voices that speak as though on
>    behalf of Wikieducator - such voices should be almost impossible to find.
>    5. Who founded Wikieducator, or what international agency gives money is
>    not as significant (merely historical) when compared to the significance of
>    the projects and individual efforts on the platform.
>    6. The people who keep Wikieducator ticking over should be seen to be
>    anonymous, humble and serving the wishes of the Users and not the desires
>    for some sort of governance policy or complex agenda. Admin should NEVER be
>    seen to be defensive (or have others defend on their behalf) and certainly
>    never argue with the Users or require anything from them other than
>    feedback. Turn off LQT or implement the suggestions immediately, unless the
>    User's it was apparently installed for speak up. And above all, admin 
> people
>    should never have an agenda other than to serve the wishes of each and 
> every
>    User as though they were highly valued paying customers
>    7. We should develop a MediaWiki that is contemporary Internet (like
>    Chris Harvey's SuperUser, Brian Lamb's embed a wiki, and Tony Hurst mashup.
>    8. Add obviously good extensions like widgets and embedded media and work
>    hard at 2 way mashup data, improved support for RSS, streamlined media 
> cross
>    uploads, use Archive.org, Blip.tv and any other media service that supports
>    Creative Commons licensing)
>    9. Either become Wikiversity, or distance Wikieducator radically from the
>    Wikimedia Foundation model. An educational wiki is very different to an
>    encyclopedia or any other reference project. (I propose a very Web2
>    MediaWiki and minimal government as a point of difference)
>    10. And just to round it off to 10, encourage truely shared ownership, by
>    supporting and encouraging individuals to run their own fundraising
>    campaigns to develop projects that improve Wikieducator. So make it 
> possible
>    for people to set up a development version
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Leigh,
>
> > I guess we are in non-violent agreement then... ahhhhh so were back to
> > the collaborative networky thing... so what does it take to build a
> > node on the network? Is WE just going through the "standard" lifecycle
> > of becoming a node?
>
> > Now, I want to see you dance!
>
> > Peter
>
> > On Nov 4, 4:36 pm, "Leigh Blackall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Peter,
>
> > > You said:
>
> > > > I challenge you to point me to something better than WE in bringing an
> > > > international set
> > > > of educators together to create a free curriculum
>
> > > Now I'm worried (though I'm relieved you dance :) "a free curriculum",
> > > surely a slip of the tongue Peter?
>
> > > The Internet is bringing (not just) educators together. I worry about
> > > "educators" who feel they need something like Wikieducator to bring them
> > > together, or that Wikieducator is the thing that is doing what the
> > Internet
> > > has been doing all along.
>
> > > An answer to your challenge Peter: *The Internet* (international network)
> > is
> > > the platform (that includes Wikieducator) that is bringing an
> > international
> > > set of educators together to offer up and develop free curricula. The
> > other
> > > great thing about that is that the wall between learning and life is
> > > breaking down.
>
> > > I am trying to look at Wikieducator as one of many "tools" or services
> > > available to me for publishing media and information, and connect with
> > like
> > > minded people and networks. It is a small piece loosely
> > > joined<http://www.smallpieces.com/>.
> > > Trouble is it takes up far more of my time than the other free tools,
> > > because of its demands around community, collaboration, governance, and
> > its
> > > tendency to centralise our efforts and not allow easy embedding and
> > > distribution. As a wiki tool it has very useful features (such as
> > > print-to-pdf), and a number of annoying ones such as not offering an easy
> > > way to backup my work.
>
> > > My OER work (along with millions of other "educators") is distributed
> > across
> > > the Internet, and as a result is networked and relavent. Wordpress,
> > Blogger,
> > > Youtube, Blip.tv, GoogleDocs, Archive.org, Wikispaces, Wikipedia,
> > > Wikiversity, Flickr, Picasa Web Galleries, and various other minor sites.
> > It
> > > is the Internet that brings us OER, and I'm trying to remind you/us of
> > that
> > > - less we fall into a trap of becoming over reliant on Wikieducator, too
> > > caught up in its rhetoric, and end up centralising and locking ourselves
> > in.
> > > Do you feel the lock in? I do.. time to dance and shake it off a bit.
>
> > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Leigh,
>
> > > > With all due respect, Not that I disagree with what you are saying its
> > > > just that I think you need a new pair of glasses. You seem to be
> > > > reading a lot into things and being overly pessimistic about good
> > > > works. In the big navel gazing world we live in, it is good people are
> > > > putting efforts into projects like WE. We may not have it right in
> > > > some peoples views, but at least we are engaged and I challenge you to
> > > > point me to something better than WE in bringing an international set
> > > > of educators together to create a free curriculum (with a good set of
> > > > the tools and a vision for it to be localized). And through time, I
> > > > hope we end up where things have become flatter and flatter.
>
> > > > "Be the change you want to see in the world" - Mahatma
>
> > > > I'm gettin' worried about you Leigh.
> > > > Watch me dance if you want some playful distraction;
>
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQz51pH5cpw
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nlxrJ16cMY
> > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lakvIXEH2iU
>
> > > > In one of our dances we were jamin' with a didgeridoo
>
> > > > Be Well...
>
> > > > Peter
>
> > > > On Nov 4, 2:46 pm, "Leigh Blackall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Hi Peter, I really like the spin on the wording that that journo has
> > > > done:
>
> > > > > WikiEducator looks like Wikipedia. In fact, it uses the same
> > software.
> > > > And,
>
> > > > > > like the online encyclopedia, its mission is ambitious. It seeks to
> > put
> > > > all
> > > > > > the world's educational materials online and make them freely
> > available
> > > > to
> > > > > > everyone on the planet by the year 2015.
>
> > > > > We shoudl copy that and replace all "one curriculum" sounding lines
> > > > straight
> > > > > away.
>
> > > > > Only trouble is, that "ambitious" mission is already happening.
> > > > Everything
> > > > > is going online, huge amounts of it freely (in terms of copyright),
> > just
> > > > not
> > > > > all of it is being centralised on Wikieducator.
>
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Randy Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Nellie,
>
> > > > > > Perhaps in your comment below, there are the seeds of an idea....
>
> > > > > > What if, at some point, there were a cluster of WikiEducators - who
> > > > > > decided....maybe in a conference setting - to work as a group, and
> > > > > > collaborate on a group of pages, on a given topic, or theme....
>
> > > > > > This could be accomplished in several days....just as a conference
> > runs
> > > > in
> > > > > > terms of time....
>
> > > > > > Thoughts, ideas?
>
> > > > > > - Randy
>
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:12 PM, NELLIE DEUTSCH <
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > >> Peter,
> > > > > >> This is a wiki. You are more than welcome to anything that my
> > students
> > > > and
> > > > > >> I have added. You may add to it and place it or replace it, add to
> > it,
> > > > and
> > > > > >> place it where you think it would be appropriate. I would love for
> > > > someone
> > > > > >> to finally play around with the wiki pages like they would with
> > > > modeling
> > > > > >> clay.
> > > > > >> Warm wishes,
> > > > > >> Nellie Deutsch
> > > > > >> Doctoral Student
> > > > > >> Educational Leadership
> > > > > >> Curriculum and Instruction
> > > > > >>http://www.nelliemuller.com
> > > > > >>http://www.integrating-technology.com/pd
> > > > > >>http://www.building-relationship.com/education
> > > > > >>http://blendedlear.ning.com
> > > > > >>http://connecting-online.ning.com
>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > >>> Thanks Nellie,
>
> > > > > >>> I look forward to the review of this project early next summer to
> > see
> > > > > >>> how we did in relation to what we have aspired to do... So far it
> > has
> > > > > >>> been exceeding my expectations. I certianly hope we can meet our
> > > > > >>> definition of success;
>
> > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Prawstho/IPS_Statement_of_Work#What_.
> > ..
>
> > > > > >>> Could I encourage you to add your project to the student
> > generated
> > > > > >>> content portal?
>
> > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Student_Generated_Content#Ac.
> > ..
>
> > > > > >>> Peter
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org
To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to