I think we could package parts of it as "small learning objects" for people to develop further. I see several so far: 1 - roles of textbooks and comparison to other entities 2 - content and instructional design as two dimensions of learning 3 - emergent pedagogies structurally different from each other (a taxonomy of pedagogies?) 4 - specifically, learning webs and communities of practice vs. "pedagogies of hierarchical organizations" (industrial models)
For myself, I see the following uses for the four objects: 1, 2 - flamebait and brainstorm facilitation tools (use to start word-based communities, events and entities, possibly to form reading lists of articles together) 3 - can develop into a tool for choosing pedagogies for my projects 4 - directly applies to my current "community of practice" projects as a framework On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Randy Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > This is such a fascinating discussion... > > Is there any way to package this - and use it as the basis of some learning > materials for a course on something.... :-) > > It's just such great dialogue.... I'm wondering how we can give it more > life than simply in the google group.. > > - Randy -- Cheers, MariaD Make math your own, to make your own math. naturalmath.com: a sketch of a social math site groups.google.com/group/naturalmath: a mailing list about math maker activities groups.google.com/group/multiplicationstudy the family multiplication study --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
