I'm with you Steve! Lets keep things simple and fun. When I started this thread I was looking to open things up with UPE and not create to many additional processes. I wanted anyone to nominate with a brief description of why. The UPE "committee" to assess if the nomination was reasonable. If yes, they would become a UPE. If no, we would provide polite feedback as to how the user page and related description could become a UPE.
Sincerely, Peter On Mar 6, 7:23 am, Steve Foerster <[email protected]> wrote: > Wayne wrote: > > Thinking out load here --- Under our emerging QA framework > > (http://www.wikieducator.org/WikiEducator:Quality_Assurance_Framework/...) > > there is a subsection called "other featured items" Would it make sense to > > re-classify the framework to include a sub-section called "Featured > > WIkiEducators" or Featured Individuals (or something similar) > > For what it's worth, the original vision for UPE was that it would be > just a fun thing that wasn't constrained by frameworks. Is there > really no room for the unofficial in WikiEducator? Does everything > have to be part of The Plan? > > "Then came the churches. > Then came the schools. > Then came the lawyers. > Then came the rules." > -- Dire Straits, "Telegraph Road" > > I realise I'm not the one who does UPE anymore, but I ask this because > it's a question with broader implications. > > -=Steve=- > > -- > Stephen H. Foersterhttp://wikieducator.org/steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
