Nellie, I believe what you are requesting is a great idea. I believe WE could use a voting system. I find myself in a dilemma with this request. I believe this is a feature WE needs, yet I consider WE biggest current risk is our current platform. My dilemma comes in that I don't believe we should add features to the platform until our current infrastructure has be migrated and upgraded. Cheers, Peter
On Mar 7, 7:18 am, NELLIE DEUTSCH <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter, > I am not advocating anything. However, would a voting system be useful on > WE? > Warm wishes, > Nellie Deutsch > Doctoral Student > Educational Leadership > Curriculum and > Instructionhttp://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C21http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller > skype:nelliedeutschmuller > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think it is important to consider that implementing a voting system > > in (or outside of) WE would distract from more important features that > > WE needs added or fixed. I believe we already have MediaWiki add ins > > that don't work properly. WE need our current infrastructure to be > > healthy, have proven processes to fixing features before we start > > adding new ones. > > Of course I will support what the community decides. > > Sincerely, Peter > > On Mar 6, 2:26 am, Sarita Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Nellie > > > > Voting for nomination is a good idea. The members will see each other's > > page > > > and will get inspired. It will also increase the involvement of members. > > > > Warm regards > > > > Saritahttp://www.wikieducator.org/User:Saritasanjay > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:59 AM, NELLIE DEUTSCH < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Peter, > > > > I would go even further and add a voting system to the nomination. The > > idea > > > > is to get members actively engaged in the process. > > > > Warm wishes, > > > > Nellie Deutsch > > > > Doctoral Student > > > > Educational Leadership > > > > Curriculum and Instruction > > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C21 > > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller > > > > skype:nelliedeutschmuller > > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> What do people think about nominating UPE's. The idea being that a WE > > > >> member could nominate any other member to be the UPE (http:// > > > >>www.wikieducator.org/UPE) and accompanying their nomination a > > > >> description of why they have been nominated. Then a small team would > > > >> evaluate the nomination against the description and if the description > > > >> is compelling and the user page matches the description they become a > > > >> UPE. This approach would hopefully open up the diversity and > > > >> creativity of the UPE. > > > > >> What do people think? > > > > >> Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
