Peter, I agree that we should focus on upgrading the current structure ASAP. Many of my colleagues are opting for pbwiki and wikispaces because they are finding WE too difficult and to use. Warm wishes, Nellie Deutsch Doctoral Student Educational Leadership Curriculum and Instruction http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C21 http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller skype:nelliedeutschmuller
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nellie, > I believe what you are requesting is a great idea. I believe WE could > use a voting system. > I find myself in a dilemma with this request. I believe this is a > feature WE needs, yet I consider WE biggest current risk is our > current platform. My dilemma comes in that I don't believe we should > add features to the platform until our current infrastructure has be > migrated and upgraded. > Cheers, Peter > > On Mar 7, 7:18 am, NELLIE DEUTSCH <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Peter, > > I am not advocating anything. However, would a voting system be useful on > > WE? > > Warm wishes, > > Nellie Deutsch > > Doctoral Student > > Educational Leadership > > Curriculum and Instructionhttp:// > www.wikieducator.org/EL4C21http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller > > skype:nelliedeutschmuller > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Peter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think it is important to consider that implementing a voting system > > > in (or outside of) WE would distract from more important features that > > > WE needs added or fixed. I believe we already have MediaWiki add ins > > > that don't work properly. WE need our current infrastructure to be > > > healthy, have proven processes to fixing features before we start > > > adding new ones. > > > Of course I will support what the community decides. > > > Sincerely, Peter > > > On Mar 6, 2:26 am, Sarita Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Nellie > > > > > > Voting for nomination is a good idea. The members will see each > other's > > > page > > > > and will get inspired. It will also increase the involvement of > members. > > > > > > Warm regards > > > > > > Saritahttp://www.wikieducator.org/User:Saritasanjay > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 9:59 AM, NELLIE DEUTSCH < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Peter, > > > > > I would go even further and add a voting system to the nomination. > The > > > idea > > > > > is to get members actively engaged in the process. > > > > > Warm wishes, > > > > > Nellie Deutsch > > > > > Doctoral Student > > > > > Educational Leadership > > > > > Curriculum and Instruction > > > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/EL4C21 > > > > >http://www.wikieducator.org/User:Nelliemuller > > > > > skype:nelliedeutschmuller > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Peter <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > >> What do people think about nominating UPE's. The idea being that a > WE > > > > >> member could nominate any other member to be the UPE (http:// > > > > >>www.wikieducator.org/UPE) and accompanying their nomination a > > > > >> description of why they have been nominated. Then a small team > would > > > > >> evaluate the nomination against the description and if the > description > > > > >> is compelling and the user page matches the description they > become a > > > > >> UPE. This approach would hopefully open up the diversity and > > > > >> creativity of the UPE. > > > > > > >> What do people think? > > > > > > >> Peter > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WikiEducator" group. To visit wikieducator: http://www.wikieducator.org To visit the discussion forum: http://groups.google.com/group/wikieducator To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
