This is going wildly of topic. But... The decency? I don't think i would agree with your characterization that people who don't like to give a carte blanche to everyone to publish (sometimes not very elegant) photos of them should treat themselves as second rank participants.
Especially in the context of a discussion around a friendly space policy, i am of the opinion that this would be a dangerous direction. Lodewijk On Sun, Aug 5, 2018, 23:24 cs <c...@edubkk.org> wrote: > In which case, those people should have the decency to not present > themselves anywhere where a photo shoot or video recording is very likely > to take place. Or politely take space at the back of the room and wear > a face mask. Personally, I don’t see why anyone should be embarrassed at > being part of a benevolent movement such as Wikipedia - have they > something disastrous to hide? In which case, perhaps they better not > go to Wikimania at all, and if they are scholarship recipients, give > their place over to someone else. > > Kudpung > > On 06, Aug2018, at 10:18, Gnangarra <gnanga...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was disappointed at the last Wikimania(london 2014) I went to with the > number of people wearing dont take my photo stickers taking up positions at > the front of the room or near speakers that made it hard to get images of > the room and record the event. > > On 6 August 2018 at 11:11, cs <c...@edubkk.org> wrote: > >> I’ve been to a great many international conferences in my career - >> but not so many since I retired. I can’t recall people wearing >> ‘Don’t touch me’, ‘Don’t photo me’, ‘Don’t come near me’, ‘Don’t talk >> to me’ badges. Do they do it nowadays already? >> >> We’ll porbably never know the details of the incident that sparked >> all this off but do I think it is getting out of proportion. >> >> Kudpung >> >> On 04, Aug2018, at 02:07, Pine W <wiki.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks, James. I think that "clarifying the distinction between friendly >> spaces situations and Trust & Safety issues" is a good idea. >> >> A specific suggestion that was made earlier in this thread which sounded >> like a good idea to me was to have an indicator, somewhat like we currently >> do for "Photos OK" or "Photos not OK", for "friendly touch OK" or "friendly >> touch not OK". >> >> I would also like to see the upcoming review of the relevant policies >> include discussions of who should be responsible for them (I'm confused >> about why WMF is in charge of these issues at events instead of the local >> organizers) and the level of transparency regarding reports and >> investigations. >> >> Thanks for your attention to these issues. >> >> Pine >> ( https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Pine ) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimania-l mailing list >> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimania-l mailing list >> Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l >> >> > > > -- > GN. > Noongarpedia: https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/nys/Main_Page > WMAU: http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/User:Gnangarra > Photo Gallery: http://gnangarra.redbubble.com > Out now: A.Gaynor, P. Newman and P. Jennings (eds.), *Never Again: > Reflections on Environmental Responsibility after Roe 8*, UWAP, 2017. Order > here > <https://uwap.uwa.edu.au/products/never-again-reflections-on-environmental-responsibility-after-roe-8> > . > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list Wikimania-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
