> > Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:02:29 +0200 > From: Thomas Goldammer <tho...@googlemail.com> > To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org> > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] ombudsmen commission > Message-ID: > <CAL0e-KVCetcaaKNQuiSwX5ckBnxqw=9_6vhkdj988ypz3wd...@mail.gmail.com > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > You can clearly document the process that you follow. You can publish > > metrics like those Lodewijk suggested (and actual numbers, not just > > guesses). It would be nice to have a page on meta that says how many > > cases are currently at each point in the process and is kept > > up-to-date. > > You just volunteered to set up such a page on Meta (for 2012, I mean). > I already described the process we use, so this should be possible for > you to do. Thanks. >
I thought Thomas's requests and suggestions in this case were quite valid and reasonable, and they did not deserve such a condescending and passive-aggressive response. I'm sure you're all very busy but that's no excuse for not continually striving for a higher standard of transparency and accountability (within the obvious restrictions that your work imposes). Regards, Craig Franklin _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
