On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Well, I'd like the Foundation to invest in such research, which is why I > brought it up here. > > I cant think of several instances of donors' money being spent on things > that to me seemed less supportive of the Foundation's core mission. > _______________________________________________ >
Perhaps while the UK chapter pursues automated methods of assessment, another chapter can apply for a WMF grant to pursue a more traditional review effort. Maybe Wikimedia DC? I don't think this kind of research is really the WMF's purview; for reasons everyone is familiar with, it's important they remain distant from reviewing and managing content. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
