Austin and all, I'm just coming back to this, and see that I have indeed been widely interpreted as having spoken from personal animosity. My one comment on this, which I hope will be allowed through, is that I carry absolutely no personal animosity toward anybody I mentioned, and if any of them do feel that I have made a personal attack on them, I hope they will contact me directly.
Pete On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Austin Hair <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 11:33 PM, Pete Forsyth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > My point was straightforward: I would certainly not be bringing this > topic > > up in a public forum if it had not been widely and extensively discussed > in > > public forums beforehand. It was brought up by Wil, not by me. His > reasons > > for doing so -- that's another matter entirely, and one I'm not > personally > > inclined to get into. > > Okay, Pete. > > Despite giving you ample opportunity to clarify your intentions, all > I'm taking away from this is "Let's all talk about Wil some more." The > consensus seems to be with me in my bewilderment. > > The horse is dead. I've temporarily set your moderation bit while the > appropriate funeral arrangements can be made. > > Austin > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
