On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:48 AM, svetlana <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:46, svetlana wrote: >> On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote: >> > That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very >> > much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on >> > WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues! >> >> if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against the >> other party >> >> instead of talking properly >> >> then the superprotect wouldn't exist at all >> >> you seeing the problem there? whose problem is it? >> desire to act out of the blue instead of collaborating >> they didn't collaborate at all >> they added the js hack as if it was something urgent, that needs saving >> people from >> >> i would only do this if someone added a virus into mv by mistake >> >> this community thinks that its power structures allow to tromp onto other >> people > > sysops aren't even held accountable > they are elected once for an infinite term > nobody reviews their contribution in position in power ever > > this would surely be solved by making them elected on a 2-year term > then re-elect
Hi svetlana, there are several large wikis which have sysop re-election policies; notably, German Wikipedia. -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
