On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:53, Pete Forsyth wrote: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana <svetl...@fastmail.com.au> wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote: > > > That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care very > > > much about the site and they notice something is terrible going wrong on > > > WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues! > > > > if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against > > the other party > > > [...] > > You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about > accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among > other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the > encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages? > > Pete > [[User:Peteforsyth]]
Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't think so, you get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it. Because you went and did something contradicting user preferences; WMF did not. You'd think it's "better" because it's "unchanged compared to what it was X months ago", and that justifies your thing? No, it does not. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
