On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 3:27 AM, svetlana <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2014, at 10:53, Pete Forsyth wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:46 PM, svetlana <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2014, at 23:42, Romaine Wiki wrote: > > > > That the community reacts the way it does now, is because they care > very > > > > much about the site and they notice something is terrible going > wrong on > > > > WMF side and too less is done to fix those problems/issues! > > > > > > if the community was not so willing to use force (ie a js hack) against > > > the other party > > > > > > [...] > > > > You talk about admin accountability, Svetlana -- but what about > > accountability for the WMF, when it makes sweeping changes that (among > > other things) remove any suggestion of an "edit" functionality from "the > > encyclopedia anyone can edit" from millions and millions of pages? > > > > Pete > > [[User:Peteforsyth]] > > Surely this issue can be solved by talking without force: if you don't > think so, you get force applied to YOU; you started a fight, and lost it. I have advocated using force? Where?! Please don't answer -- I am done with this thread, it has no basis in reality. > Because you went and did something contradicting user preferences; WMF did > not. You'd think it's "better" because it's "unchanged compared to what it > was X months ago", and that justifies your thing? No, it does not. > I don't even know what you're talking about here. But again -- let's let it go. Pete _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
