On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Marc A. Pelletier <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/15/2014 04:52 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > > I suggest that you need a stricter definition to start with. > > It's also highly disputable that the Foundation would be justified in > reducing the fiduciary care it must employ in its investment strategy > for a set of ill-defined objectives that fall entirely outside its > mission - no matter how agreeable those objectives may be to many of the > volunteers. > > -- Marc > > > I'm not a natural fan of "divestment ethics", but I don't know that there is much dispute these days that it is possible to fulfill fiduciary duties *and* invest using values / ethics oriented strategy. Twenty years ago perhaps it was uncommon, but today ethical (or social responsibility) investment strategy is common among non-profits and there are many dedicated funds for the purpose. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
