On 29/04/2015 10:57, Dariusz Jemielniak wrote:
In fact, one could experiment with adding WMF as an organization equal
to chapters to elections of "chapter seats", and banning WMF/chapters
employees from "community seats" elections altogether ;) But
seriously, I think the practical thing to do would be to start working
on the rules of next elections right after the current ones are over,
and introduce eligibility based on actual activity only (with possible
lower requirements). best, dj "pundit"
The problem with that is the assumption that just because an
organisation (whether it be WMF, WMDE, WMFR, WMUK, WMAT, ...) has a
voice in the affiliate seats, that their employees/members have a say in
how their organisation vote for those seats. Different organisation will
come to their conclusion differently, whether that be an open discussion
within their community, internal board discussion, vote amongst its
members, or even possibly delegation to a sub-committee/person to decide.
KTC
--
Katie Chan
Any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent the view of any organisation the author is
associated with or employed by.
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
