I introduce you FopThreat.js
<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Ricordisamoa/FopThreat.js>, which
blackens Commons files whose description pages include one of the FoP
templates <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:FoP_templates>.
It uses Tool Labs so it may not be properly suitable for production... ;-)
Il 22/06/2015 19:01, Sam Klein ha scritto:
You could find candidates in the most popular images and tag them by hand.
If it seems /possible/ that the image is affected, it could be faded out.
As you say, that might be enough for it to be removed. If it is /likely/
that it is affected, it could be lightboxed or replaced.
Julia Reda, the Pirate in the European Parliament, has a fantastic blog
post summary:
https://juliareda.eu/2015/06/fop-under-threat/
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
