On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Milos Rancic <mill...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In other words, although I am not disclosing all of information I > have, mostly to protect privacy of some people, Yes, this is a difficult line to walk. I have encountered this issue many times in the Wikimedia world. In some cases, it simply means that public discussion is not a useful tool for addressing the issue. I don't know whether or not that is the case here, but it seems like a strong possibility. > I am not cryptic at all. Well, thank you for clarifying that point for us ;) > It is just a matter of what's perceived as important to a Western and what > to an Indian Wikimedian. > One must know what something is, before one can make a judgment about how important it is. So no, I don't think that is what's at issue here. Speaking for myself, I believe (and have always believed) that improving the ability of disadvantaged populations to engage with the Wikimedia projects is a top priority. I know the same is true of many others on this list as well. I can tell from your messages that you are concerned about something in that realm; but I don't get a clear enough picture of what you're talking about to see how I can contribute to a discussion. I can reassert the general point as I did above, so I guess I am politically correct. And I can redouble my efforts as an individual and as a business owner to educate, guide, mentor, and learn from/with those around me. Beyond that, I'll leave this discussion to those who understand what it's about. -Pete [[User:Peteforsyth]] _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
