I think the calendar I mentioned above on Meta probably could be improved in some ways. If a lot of folks start using it, it will become quite long, for one. An archiving system for each month might be a good idea.
What ways could there be to sort or segment the calendar that would be useful for volunteers to search and parse important discussions, surveys, and consultations? - Chris On Mar 19, 2017 7:57 AM, "Gerard Meijssen" <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hoi, > Please .. > > From my perspective we should not talk about secondary topics like this. We > should certainly not be this aggressive. I said it before and I say it > again. When you are interested in what we aim to achieve talk about WHAT we > can do to do better and let HOW we can do better from an organisational > point of view be only supportive of our objectives. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 19 March 2017 at 13:45, Rogol Domedonfors <domedonf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > "Jethro" > > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 8:15 PM, you wrote: > > > > > Well, folks are free to ignore invitations to comment; there are > indeed a > > > lot of discussion notices for various matters, so I don't blame them if > > > they world rather volunteer their time in other places. > > > > > > > > > > But they cannot then also argue that they didn't know about it. If > people > > > want to know what's going on in our projects, it's their responsibility > > to > > > follow places where announcements are posted and read them. > > > > > > - Chris > > > > > > > Really? As a Community Organiser within the Community Engagement part of > > the Foundation, do you not believe that the Foundation has some kind of > > responsibility too? Perhaps the Foundation, with its tens of millions of > > dollars and hundereds of staff, and its ownership and control of the > means > > of communcation, might consider whether it can organise its engagement > with > > a disparate community on a more sophisticated basis than telling the > > volunteers that it's their responsbility to know how to engage > effectively > > with the Foundation? Let me ask to to reread your comments from the > point > > of view of a volunteer whose work builds the projects and ask yourself > > whether the attitude embodied in your comment is not just ever so > slightly > > sub-optimal? Are you completely satsifed that there is nothing at all > that > > the Foundation could or should do to improve the engagement it has with > the > > community? > > > > "Rogol" > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > > wiki/Wikimedia-l > > New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/ > wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>