Victoria

Thanks for that.  As you may gather, I have not found that in the past
those interactions all went well.  But we can hope.

"Rogol"

On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Victoria Coleman <vcole...@wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> Ah, sorry, I misunderstood your question Rogol. So let me try and give you
> my point of view on the essence of your question. The Tech department in
> the Foundation, the TechCom and the volunteer developer community work to
> support the movement and its people, from readers to contributors and
> beyond. What this  tech community overall works on is driven by the needs
> of the movement. Some of these needs are purely technical. For example we
> want to minimize latency for both readers and contributors so we spend a
> lot of effort in understanding what causes latency and how to reduce it.
> Other needs come from the need to build new features. An example of this
> would be ORES and the scoring tool that many editors use. How do we collect
> and prioritize these needs? In some cases through our own expertise, in
> some cases by being part of the community , in others by doing research to
> understand what works and yet in others  by working closely with the
> Audiences team in the Foundation. The Audiences team has the mandate to
> deliver user facing features based on research and close interaction with
> the community. The Community wishlist being a great example of that work.
> The Community Engagement team through the Community Liaisons is another
> great way for us to collect input for the community.
>
> I would  of course also welcome your ideas and suggestions as well as
> those of other members of the community for how we could better capture the
> views and needs of our users and our contributors.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Victoria
>
>
>
> > On Jul 29, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Rogol Domedonfors <domedonf...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Victoria
> >
> > Thanks you for your prompt and full reply.  However, you describe how
> > volunteer developers will interact with TechCom, but my question was
> about
> > the users across the world and the content contributors in the various
> > projects, who will be using the products and services that WMF and the
> > pther developers work on.  I assume that TechCom will wish to understand
> > the views of what those users and contributors want and need -- how will
> > those be be taken into account?
> >
> > "Rogol"
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Victoria Coleman <
> vcole...@wikimedia.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you Rogol. The primary way that the volunteer developer community
> >> will interact with the TechCom is through the use of the RFC process as
> was
> >> the case  with the ArchCom beforehand. The TechCom itself of course is
> open
> >> to the volunteer developer community for participation and since we are
> >> expanding membership to cover a broader area of technologies that the
> >> ArchCom was able to cover, there will be more opportunity to get
> involved.
> >> We are looking forward to that and as Daniel and I  will be present at
> >> Wikimania we will discuss the workings and goals of the new charter with
> >> anyone who is interested. I would encourage you and anyone else who
> wants
> >> to know more to reach out to Daniel or myself  to arrange to get
> together.
> >> For those who cannot attend Wikimania, we will host a webcast in the
> next
> >> few weeks to introduce the new committee and its charter and take
> questions.
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >>
> >> Victoria
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Jul 29, 2017, at 2:17 PM, Rogol Domedonfors <domedonf...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Victoria
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for that.  I am sure we all welcome the new Committee.  The
> >>> description of its role mentions that it is "the guardian of the
> >> integrity,
> >>> consistency, stability and performance of the software supporting the
> >>> Wikimedia projects", and its "authority on technical decisions
> regarding
> >>> any official software that serves Wikimedia users".  Could you say
> >>> something about how the Committee will work with the community in its
> >>> various aspects to find out what forms of support and service the users
> >> and
> >>> contributors want and need?
> >>>
> >>> "Rogol"
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Victoria Coleman <
> >> vcole...@wikimedia.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello All!
> >>>>
> >>>> Daniel and I would like to share some good news:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> After  talking about it for years, and vetting the draft for months,
> >>>> it's finally done: the Architecture Committee has adopted a proper
> >> charter
> >>>> defining its purpose, operation, and authority.
> >>>>
> >>>> You can find the charter here:
> >>>> <https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Committee/Charter
> <
> >>>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Technical_Committee/Charter
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> The charter among other things defines from where the committee draws
> >> its
> >>>> authority over technical development at the WMF: the committee acts as
> >> an
> >>>> extension of the CTO. This gives the committee  a clear role in the
> >>>> foundation's decision
> >>>> making processes.
> >>>>
> >>>> The charter also clarifies the scope of TechCom: it is to act as an
> >>>> authority on
> >>>> technical decisions regarding any official software that serves
> >> Wikimedia
> >>>> users.
> >>>> The committee should be involved in matters regarding such software
> that
> >>>> are
> >>>> strategic, cross-cutting, or hard to undo.
> >>>>
> >>>> The committee has also given itself a new name, to better fit the
> scope
> >> as
> >>>> defined in the charter: we are now the Wikimedia Technical Committee
> >>>> (TechCom).
> >>>>
> >>>> Looking forward to working with the technical community to fulfill the
> >>>> charter!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Victoria & Daniel
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >>>> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >>>> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >>>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> ,
> >>>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >>> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> >> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/
> wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to