Hey Paulo

I imagine many of the board are following this. I am fairly easy to get a
hold of with the "email this user" attached to my user pages. And you can
always leave me a note on Wikipedia itself
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Doc_James

Maria Sefidari and Nataliia Tymkiv are the two WMF board members who
directly oversee Affcom's work. We also have the Wikimedia Foundation Board
noticeboard
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_noticeboard

Affcom sends the board a detailed overview of their work each month. I am
not aware of the specifics of your case but will ask for further details.

Best
James

On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:08 AM Paulo Santos Perneta <
paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tomasz,
>
> Thank you very much for the information. It is quite unexpected that the
> Board of Trustees can't be officially reached in any way, and we have to
> try to find our way individually to one and each of the trustees, until one
> of them accepts the hot potato in their hands (or not).
>
> I wonder how all this got to this point.
>
> Regards,
> Paulo
>
> Tomasz Ganicz <polime...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/05/2019
> à(s)
> 17:01:
>
> > As far as I know there is no single E-mail address you can contact Board,
> > but you can try to catch directly any members of the Board who are still
> > brave enough to provide their personal E-mail... This is not that
> > straightforward as you may expect, but first go here:
> >
> > https://wikimediafoundation.org/role/board/
> >
> > than click on any face you may find especially friendly, and then in some
> > cases (not in all) by clicking links in their description, with some good
> > luck  you may land on the page, where there is some contact information
> :-)
> >
> > Or - much simpler: forget rather useless official WMF website, which is
> > tailored rather to impress than to provide any information,  and go to
> > meta:
> >
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Board_of_Trustees
> >
> > where you can find link to meta-userpages of them and then you can
> contact
> > them as usually on wiki.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> >
> > pon., 6 maj 2019 o 17:09 Paulo Santos Perneta <paulospern...@gmail.com>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hello Tomasz,
> > >
> > > Thank you for your answer. In the hypothesis of being the Board, how
> can
> > > one contact it? I do not see any address I could use listed here:
> > > https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/contact/
> > >
> > > I hope at least some of them are reading this mailing list. They can
> get
> > > back to me, in public or private, and I'll send the case for
> > investigation.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Paulo
> > >
> > > Tomasz Ganicz <polime...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia segunda, 6/05/2019
> > > à(s)
> > > 15:57:
> > >
> > > > It seems that the only body can help with this is WMF Board od
> > Trustees,
> > > as
> > > > Affcom is the advisory committee of the Board, and the Board is the
> top
> > > > body legally responsible for the work of entire WMF.
> > > >
> > > > pon., 6 maj 2019 o 15:39 Paulo Santos Perneta <
> paulospern...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Cornelius,
> > > > >
> > > > > Apart from the general discussion about the specific role of
> AffCom,
> > I
> > > > > really would like to know who is the entity overseeing the AFfCom,
> so
> > > > that
> > > > > I can send an official complaint there about what I believe is a
> > > > fraudulent
> > > > > and out of process sanction. This is not a question for the Roles &
> > > > > Responsibilities WG, as The Land has already noted there.
> > > > >
> > > > > Since AffCom is an advisory body to the BoT, it doesn't look as if
> > the
> > > > BoT
> > > > > can or should interfere directly on AffCom. But then, who? At the
> > > current
> > > > > light, AffCom is looking as a very much unchecked and extremely
> > > powerful
> > > > > entity, taking decisions out of process, in absolute secrecy, and
> > > issuing
> > > > > decrees without following even the most basic principles of due
> > > process.
> > > > > And this is not a theoretical question, it is a practical one. It
> > > affects
> > > > > directly not only affiliates, but also members of the community not
> > > > > connected to any affiliate, as I had not any connection to any of
> the
> > > > > affiliates involved in that case.
> > > > >
> > > > > And this is not an isolated case. As I told, the accusations made
> > last
> > > > year
> > > > > by AffCom against WMPT never were substantiated, and when a lawyer
> > > > finally
> > > > > looked into them, he come out with exactly the same recommendation
> > and
> > > > > request the chapter made itself to the AffCom, before the whole
> > > situation
> > > > > even started. So what was behind those accusations, back then?
> > > > >
> > > > > It is very easy and comfortable for the WMF/AffCom to blind
> > everything
> > > > with
> > > > > the excuse that the evidence is secret, but that is completely out
> of
> > > > > process, and against the most elementary principles of Human
> Rights.
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to know who planted this false information at the WMF, and
> why
> > > it
> > > > > was not checked by the WMF, to the point that a secret sanction
> > aganitt
> > > > me
> > > > > come to be in place (since when? till when? no idea).
> > > > >
> > > > > To who should I complaint about this?
> > > > >
> > > > > Paulo
> > > > >
> > > > > Cornelius Kibelka <cornelius.kibe...@wikimedia.de> escreveu no dia
> > > > > segunda,
> > > > > 6/05/2019 à(s) 14:14:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think these are good and relevant questions, but I'd suggest
> you
> > > keep
> > > > > the
> > > > > > discussion where it's best placed – on the talk page of the
> Roles &
> > > > > > Responsibility scoping document talk page:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Strategy/Wikimedia_movement/2018-20/2019_Community_Conversations/Roles_%26_Responsibilities#Role_of_the_AffCom
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paulo has already started a discussion over there. Kirill, it
> would
> > > be
> > > > > > great if you could add your opinion and experience there as well.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best regards
> > > > > > Cornelius
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 15:11, Kiril Simeonovski <
> > > > > > kiril.simeonov...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > P.S. I would also like to add the other committees in the
> > movement
> > > > such
> > > > > > > like the grantmaking committees. My first go would be the Board
> > of
> > > > > > Trustees
> > > > > > > but it is better to see if someone who knows exactly can
> provide
> > > more
> > > > > > > details.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Kiril
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 3:03 PM Kiril Simeonovski <
> > > > > > > kiril.simeonov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi Paulo,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is an excellent question. I am curious to find out that
> > too.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Kiril
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 12:13 PM Paulo Santos Perneta <
> > > > > > > > paulospern...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> Actually, I'm not familiar with this specific situation as
> > well,
> > > > > apart
> > > > > > > >> from
> > > > > > > >> having been informed by my affiliate that WMF had informed
> it
> > I
> > > > was
> > > > > > > under
> > > > > > > >> some sanction that probably I was unaware of, related to
> > > > affiliates
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > >> not part of and episotes I do not took part.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> This is an outraging, appalling and unbelievable behavior
> from
> > > the
> > > > > > > >> Wikimedia Foundation in general, and AffCom in particular. I
> > > > really
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > >> like to get to the bottom of this, and more than have it
> > > > reverted, I
> > > > > > > >> actually want to know who planted the false information
> about
> > me
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > >> which led to this situation.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> I hope there is some way to effectively and officially
> demand
> > > and
> > > > > > > internal
> > > > > > > >> inquiry inside the Wikimedia Foundation over this situation.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Best,
> > > > > > > >> Paulo
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Benjamin Ikuta <benjaminik...@gmail.com> escreveu no dia
> > > segunda,
> > > > > > > >> 6/05/2019
> > > > > > > >> à(s) 10:20:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > I'm not familiar with this specific situation, but I agree
> > > that
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > >> > transparency and accountability would be good.
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > On May 6, 2019, at 12:40 AM, Paulo Santos Perneta <
> > > > > > > >> paulospern...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > > Hello,
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > A few days ago the Wikimedia affiliate I belong to was
> > > > > officially
> > > > > > > >> > informed,
> > > > > > > >> > > by a WMF source, that I'm being subject to a until now
> > > unknown
> > > > > > > >> sanction,
> > > > > > > >> > > with an accusation from AffCom I can only describe as
> > > baseless
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > >> > > fraudulent, relating to a a situation between two
> > > affiliates,
> > > > > > dealt
> > > > > > > >> with
> > > > > > > >> > by
> > > > > > > >> > > AffCom more than one year ago, of which I was never part
> > of,
> > > > > > > occurred
> > > > > > > >> > more
> > > > > > > >> > > than one year ago. I was never informed of this.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > This is not the first time AffCom engages in this sort
> of
> > > > > > appalling
> > > > > > > >> > > behavior. As far as I know, WMPT is still waiting for
> the
> > > > > > > accusations
> > > > > > > >> > made
> > > > > > > >> > > by AffCom last year, which led to its suspension, to be
> > > > > > > substantiated.
> > > > > > > >> > > AffCom never substantiated anything related to that,
> with
> > > the
> > > > > > excuse
> > > > > > > >> of a
> > > > > > > >> > > need for secrecy.
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > How, I ask you all as members of the Movement, how come
> > the
> > > > > > > Wikimedia
> > > > > > > >> > > Movement allowed for such a secretive, arbitrary,
> > apparently
> > > > > > > unchecked
> > > > > > > >> > and
> > > > > > > >> > > very much powerful institution to grow and thrive like
> > this
> > > in
> > > > > its
> > > > > > > >> > middle,
> > > > > > > >> > > overseeing and effectively controlling the relation of
> all
> > > of
> > > > us
> > > > > > > (both
> > > > > > > >> > > affiliates and individuals) and the WMF?
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > More important than that, what can be done about this?
> > Where
> > > > one
> > > > > > can
> > > > > > > >> > appeal
> > > > > > > >> > > to, when presented with such fraudulent, baseless,
> > > secretive,
> > > > > > > >> > > unsubstantiated accusations by a body which was supposed
> > to
> > > be
> > > > > > above
> > > > > > > >> all
> > > > > > > >> > > suspicion?
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Can an internal inquiry be demanded somewhere at the
> > > Wikimedia
> > > > > > > >> Foundation
> > > > > > > >> > > over the activities and decisions of AffCom, in the same
> > way
> > > > we
> > > > > do
> > > > > > > >> with
> > > > > > > >> > > suspicious activity by checkusers and supervisors, with
> > the
> > > > > > > Ombudsman
> > > > > > > >> > > Commission?
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Looking forward for any help and insight on this,
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> > > Paulo - DarwIn
> > > > > > > >> > > Wikimedia Portugal
> > > > > > > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > >> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > >> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > >> > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > >> ,
> > > > > > > >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > >> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> > and
> > > > > > > >> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > >> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > >> > Unsubscribe:
> > > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > >> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > >> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
> and
> > > > > > > >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > >> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > >> Unsubscribe:
> > > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> > > > > > ,
> > > > > > > >> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Cornelius Kibelka
> > > > > > Internationale Beziehungen | International Relations
> > > > > > Vorstandsteam | Office of the ED
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963
> Berlin
> > > > > > Tel. (030) 219 158 26-0
> > > > > > http://wikimedia.de
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Stellen Sie sich eine Welt vor, in der jeder Mensch an der Menge
> > > allen
> > > > > > Wissens frei teilhaben kann. Helfen Sie uns dabei!
> > > > > > http://spenden.wikimedia.de/
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens
> > e.
> > > V.
> > > > > > Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts
> > Berlin-Charlottenburg
> > > > > unter
> > > > > > der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das
> Finanzamt
> > > für
> > > > > > Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> > ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > > Unsubscribe:
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
> > > > http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
> > > > http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > > Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
> > http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
> > http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
> New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>



-- 
James Heilman
MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and 
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l
New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to