Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 15:46 Yann Forget <yan...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 15:32, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> a > écrit : > > > On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 04:50, Yann Forget <yan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Currently, we require a confirmation via OTRS if an image was > previously > > > published elsewhere before being uploaded to Commons. > > > > Really? can you provide a link to a policy age proving that assertion? > > > > Your claim rather makes a mockery of the suggestion that people should > > publish to, for example, Flickr before importing to commons > > > > Unless the external publication is done with a free license, of course. > AFAIK, there is no "official" suggestion that people should publish to > Flickr before importing to Commons. > For EU citizens upload at Flickr could actually reduce our GDPR-responsibility as platform. Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 16:03 Lane Rasberry < l...@bluerasberry.com> ha scritto: > > > The answer is not to lower the quality of our content, but rather to > communicate more effectively the standard of quality that we require. With > our standards already being so low, requiring things like proof of legal > compliance, minimal verifiability, and having brief civil conversations in > case of difficulty, it is challenging for me to imagine us reducing any of > these already reasonable expectations. > +10 Il giorno lun 13 mag 2019 alle ore 21:42 Isaac Olatunde < reachout2is...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Not all local sysops have a strong knowledge of image licensing and I think > allowing local sysops not familiar with image licensing and how Commons > community works in general to delete\undelete files would be > counterproductive. > I still think they can just left performing actions at their own responsibility. Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 15:25 Paulo Santos Perneta < paulospern...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Nah, of course they do. We are using filters at the Portuguese Wikipedia > since 2009, and I can say, without blinking, that if it was not for > filters, IPs would have ceased to be allowed to edit at all there for good > now, so much it is the amount of IP vandalism that they automatically catch > and block... per hour. With some false positives in the middle, of course, > but nothing is perfect. I agree, but most of abusefilter effectiveness lies in 'block' option, which is not so common among wikis. Vito _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
