Martijn > > I'm under no such obligation,
Indeed, none of us is under any such obligation, which is why it is somewhat pointless for one list member to issue orders to another, such as "Don't do that." > I do want to call out when something so egregiously > off base is put forward as the assertion that wikipedia is unreliable > *because* it has a policy that prevents it from citing itself, > And if anyone were to put forward that assertion, by all means call it out. You will have noticed, I'm sure that the initial post on this thread asserted that Wikipedia has a policy that prevents it from citing itself *because* it is unreliable. Quite a different thing. Thrapostibongles _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
