I’m against and sincerly I don’t trust this datas (80% agrees? Are you kidding me? I’ve seen the meta discussion). I think a Meta CLEAR VOTE as suggested here is the best way. Imposing a change like this is a wrong decision.
Regards. > Il giorno 6 set 2019, alle ore 05:49, Zack McCune <zmcc...@wikimedia.org> ha > scritto: > > *Summary* - We want your help with a voluntary, OPT-IN design process for > movement branding. Please join the in-depth discussion group, or watch for > updates on Meta-Wiki. > > > Hello all, > > After 4 months of community consultation, spanning dozens of affiliates, > several mailing lists, community conferences, and Meta-Wiki, I am pleased > to share a summary of feedback on the proposed 2030 movement brand strategy > [1]. > > From more than 319 comments, representing 150 individual contributors and > 63 affiliates, we assessed 6 major themes in feedback: > > 1. > > Reducing confusion > 2. > > Protecting reputation > 3. > > Supporting sister projects > 4. > > Addressing (legal, governmental) risks > 5. > > Supporting movement growth > 6. > > The process of change > > Please visit our feedback summary page to learn more [2]. You will see > examples of comments within each section, along with a rough indication of > how many of the comments that we received were related to each theme. > > The comments sometimes contradict one another, showing that across our wide > movement’s experience, different points of view are common (and a sign of > health!). To visualize these tensions, we have created “polarity maps” > which are used to help visualize how different arguments coexist in tension > with each other. > > Ultimately, the comments provided from you all are very thoughtful and > useful guidance on what is needed to make our movement’s branding > successful. One can read the 6 themes above as “criteria” for assessing > branding systems. > > == Thanks == > > I would like to thank the organizers of Iberoconf, Wikipedia Education > Summit, and the Wikimedia Summit for inviting us to hold discussions during > their sessions. I would also like to thank my colleagues Elena Lappen, > Samir Elsharbaty, and Blanca Flores who conducted extensive parts of this > consultation. To the hundreds of people, and dozens of affiliates > commenting, thank you for reviewing the proposal and offering your > perspectives and insights. > > > == Next steps and staying involved == > > There is considerable support for the brand proposal and general appetite > to improve our movement’s branding system. Further, we believe that > critical feedback on the proposal offers direct guidance for precisely what > branding must do to be successful for our movement. We have shared these > insights and our proposed continuance with the Board of Trustees, who > approved continuing these efforts. > > Acting on community insights, we will be collaborating on formal brand > naming, visual identity, and brand system design that will use “Wikipedia” > as the central reference point. The resulting system will be OPT-IN for > affiliates. > > This design process will be guided by a “brand network” – a group of > volunteers who would like to continue advising on brand during this > consultation. Dozens of people have already volunteered, and we invite you > to join the group. We will use a group on Wikimedia Space to host this > discussion and the group will be closed to allow candid discussions and > room for iterations. EVERYONE IS INVITED TO JOIN [3]. If you do not want to > commit to the in-depth, longer term discussions that will be happening > within the brand network group, we will still be tracking comments left on > the project’s Meta-Wiki page [4]. Furthermore, all important ideas and > updates originating from the brand network discussion will be shared > publicly to mailing lists and Meta-Wiki. > > The development of this proposed identity system will take approximately 6 > months. As stated, regular updates will be shared to mailing lists, > Wikimedia Space, and Meta-Wiki [4]. Please engage us where you are most > comfortable! Once complete, community groups will have the power to decide > if/when they opt in to using the new system. > > Yours, > > Zack > > [1] > https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2019/02/26/leading-with-wikipedia-a-brand-proposal-for-2030/ > > > [2] > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning/community_review/results > > > [3] https://discuss-space.wmflabs.org/g/brand-network and click the gray > "Request" button. When your request is approved, you will be able to see > and access the brand network discussion category on the Discuss Space main > page. > > [4] > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Wikimedia_brands/2030_research_and_planning > > > -- > > Zack McCune (he/him) > > Director of Brand > > Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l > New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l New messages to: Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
