One correction: I'm not a trustee! ________________________________ From: Christophe Henner via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2026 5:41 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]> Cc: Christophe Henner <[email protected]> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikipedia at 25: A Wake-Up Call (essay)
I apologize for my oversight of Galder and you, I forgot you both were trustees of Wikimedia Organizations. Out of how many trustees and employee, 2 is infinitely more than 0 but still a way to low number imo -- Christophe On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 at 17:06, James Heilman via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: We as a movement have tons of ideas. A lack of ideas has never been our problem. For example there is a group of us pushing for innovation around video, but there has been plenty of pushback and hesitancy from many corners. For example we built the ability to allow MP4 upload on Commons, we developed universal consensus on Commons to allow MP4 upload, and now the WMF appears to be dragging their feet with respect to concerns in part that our technical infrastructure cannot handle MORE contributors. And this despite our claim to be the central infrastructure of the open internet. Meh. With respect to engagement of "trustees of any Wikimedia organizations", I am here, Galder is here, among others. Christophe did you mean the WMF? With respect to outside consultants, I agree they are generally not helpful as it takes SOO long to get them up to speed. I have some of the same concerns regarding turn over of top level management within movement organizations. We are a complicated and unique movement that takes a long time to figure out. J On Thu, Jul 2, 2026 at 12:51 PM Galder Gonzalez Larrañaga via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I totally agree with Amir here. I would add that the issue of low responses to Wikimedia-l, Telegram, Discord or Meta is not about people not having ideas: is about those that should implement the ideas they should be hearing. The last years have been a continuous risk-management communication process by those who should advance in our project, trying to explain why they were going in the opposite direction. We are getting older, and if discussions are dismissed, or even silenced, people are not going to spend their time on that, and younger members won't know that they can, indeed, discuss. Because, what's the point of this discussion if there's no one with real power to take notes and propose actions? ________________________________ From: Amir E. Aharoni via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2026 12:00 PM To: Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Amir E. Aharoni <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Re: Wikipedia at 25: A Wake-Up Call (essay) בתאריך יום ה׳, 2 ביולי 2026 ב-12:32 מאת Yaroslav Blanter via Wikimedia-l <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>: You do not need people to generate ideas. I am sure a lot of ideas can be generated in an unstructured way onwiki. Yes, by people :) If you are referring to physical-space meetings, then yes—they are not absolutely necessary for generating. I do think that getting people together in a physical space to generate ideas can be better. The number of those meetings in 2019 was quite possibly excessive, however. They will be contradictory and will require some effort to select something useful. For this selection, one would need indeed a small committee or staff or may be both. It must be a committee of *Wikimedians*, trusted by the wider *Wikimedians* community, and without significant differences of privileges between committee members and other community members. It must not be a committee of external consultants. At least not too many of them. In 2019, there were definitely too many. To implement these ideas is a totally different story. I guess here is where you need people to be paid to work on. Of course, that's what I mean when I say that Wikimedians need money (and perhaps other resources) to get what they need implemented. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/NP4Y6SXY5ZLETU27FPHDPC56AWC5HC22/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> -- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/V2S6WKO4QGGLUEZDBS2GVTDLD5PHMDN5/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list -- [email protected], guidelines at: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines and https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia-l Public archives at https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/message/HJUVIB2WHPYIK53P67TB6CBF7IYNOWNB/ To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
