On 6/02/10 6:44 AM, Tei wrote: > On 5 February 2010 20:17, Aryeh Gregor<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Daniel Kinzler<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Or, >>> to put it differently: let people use "flat tagging", but let's keep the >>> notion >>> of one tag implying another, i.e. math implying science and texas implying >>> america. >>> >> And as for [[Category:People executed for heresy]] -> [[Category:Joan >> of Arc]] -> [[English claims to the French throne]]? That's only two >> steps, and it already doesn't make sense. You could argue that >> [[Category:Joan of Arc]] really means [[Category:Stuff related to Joan >> of Arc]] and shouldn't be in [[Category:People executed for heresy]], >> but that sounds like it would take as much recategorization work as >> just using atomic categories -- and much subtler. >> > > off-topic >
Not at all, it's entirely reasonable to discuss the problems associated with the current categorisation system, and what methods we'd like to use to improve it. -- Andrew Garrett [email protected] http://werdn.us _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
