>> Please make an unambiguous list of the hoops Commons will be required >> to jump through before this feature can happen, so it's actually clear Way to be acerbic...
> list of these hoops, only vague generic hoops that apply to any kind [..] > Like Aryeh said, Neil is currently working on a concrete > implementation of category intersections. Only when that > implementation is complete (or at least close) will it be possible to > provide the definitive, specific and unambiguous list of requirements > you asked for. Not really. There are two main points 1) category deep tree traversal (flattening / deep indexing) at runtime is technically unfeasable. 2) automatic flattening produces nonsense results Ok, lets's say Neil found a way to deal with 10. I give you that this is implementation specific. Number 2) however is independent of any implementation. Here you have your "hoop" (to to stick with your pejorative lingo): Get rid of the crazy category system and go atomic. What is vague about this, what part of this is unclear to you? _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
